Sasquatch Exchange
TRADE
OrdersSupportAffiliatePrivate Swap

Private DAI on Solana to ARB on Ethereum Swap

FromSolana
ToEthereum
ENTER AMOUNT
Squatch Guard
Before a deposit order moves forward, Squatch Guard checks the amount, asset, network, and active quote window against the order details.
ARB / USD
Price
—
24h
—
High
—
Low
—
Vol
—

What you need to know

Privacy considerations for DAI to ARB

Where offered, Private Route is designed to reduce an obvious direct association between the sending wallet and received assets; it does not make DAI on Solana or ARB on Ethereum activity anonymous or invisible. Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. Ethereum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. It is the settlement-layer EVM network for this inventory. ERC-20 transfers can require a separate approval, base fee and priority fee affect source cost, and an L1 token contract does not establish an L2 representation. DAI is a crypto-backed dollar-oriented stablecoin whose canonical and bridged contracts vary by network. Its peg design does not make two network representations interchangeable. ARB is a governance token and does not pay Arbitrum transaction gas; ETH remains the gas asset. A bridged ARB contract on another network is a separate representation from the Arbitrum token. Stablecoins can exist through different contracts and issuers on different networks. Confirm the exact representation and remember that contract events, issuer controls, receiving services, and later transfers can add context beyond the immediate swap. Identity-verification requirements are separate and must be checked in the live flow.

What remains visible on Solana

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. SOL is the native gas asset for Solana. Reusing the sending address, approval pattern, or recognizable amount can preserve source-side context.

What remains visible on Ethereum

Ethereum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. It is the settlement-layer EVM network for this inventory. ERC-20 transfers can require a separate approval, base fee and priority fee affect source cost, and an L1 token contract does not establish an L2 representation. Receiving-address reuse, immediate consolidation, and later transfers can create destination-side associations.

Solana source role versus Ethereum destination role

A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. Those source-side events remain visible. An Ethereum receipt is an L1 native ETH balance or ERC-20 contract event; later token movement can require ETH gas and a new approval for another contract. That receipt and later destination activity remain visible.

Solana source activity and EVM delivery remain inspectable

Solana exposes the source signature, accounts, mint or native balance changes, programs, and SOL fee. Ethereum exposes the destination 0x account, token contract or native receipt, logs, and later gas funding.

Stablecoin contracts add representation and issuer context

DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. Source contract events remain visible. A receiving wallet should show the exact ARB contract on the destination. Receipt does not fund ETH gas for later token movement. Issuer controls, receiving-service deposits, and later transfers can provide context beyond the immediate route.

DAI collateral-token and bridge evidence; ARB approval and governance-token evidence

DAI is a crypto-backed stablecoin, but each network representation has its own public contract events. Provider routing does not hide allowances, transfers, receiving addresses, or later consolidation. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. Those source events remain public. Token allowances, contract transfers, voting or utility interactions, source gas, and later wallet consolidation can remain visible for this receipt. A receiving wallet should show the exact ARB contract on the destination. Receipt does not fund ETH gas for later token movement. The receipt and later destination use remain public.

What Private Route changes—and what it does not

Private routing can reduce a direct association between the Solana source account and EVM receiver. The source signature, program and token-account changes, destination contract logs, gas, amounts, and timing remain public. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. An Ethereum receipt is an L1 native ETH balance or ERC-20 contract event; later token movement can require ETH gas and a new approval for another contract. A receiving wallet should show the exact ARB contract on the destination. Receipt does not fund ETH gas for later token movement.

Verification and provider policy for this exact route

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. An Ethereum receipt is an L1 native ETH balance or ERC-20 contract event; later token movement can require ETH gas and a new approval for another contract. A receiving wallet should show the exact ARB contract on the destination. Receipt does not fund ETH gas for later token movement.

Private Route for DAI → ARB

Solana account, token, program, signature, and fee activity remain public, and Ethereum wallet, token-transfer, contract, log, and gas activity remain public. For this DAI on Solana to ARB on Ethereum path, Private Route is intended to reduce the direct visible relationship between activity around the source-side Base58-encoded Solana account address and destination-side EVM 0x account address; it does not hide either chain's public records.

  • ✓Reduces the obvious link between the DAI deposit and ARB receipt
  • ✓Compare standard and Private Route options for Solana → Ethereum
  • ✓Shows what remains public on Solana and Ethereum before you deposit
Check Private Route availability →

Related routes

DAI to ARB standard routeStandard routePrivate ARB to DAI optionsReverse privacy-intent routePrivate swap directoryHow private crypto swaps workWhat blockchain data remains publicSwap ARB to DAIReverse routeDai (DAI)Arbitrum (ARB)

Private DAI on Solana to ARB on Ethereum Swap FAQs

What must be checked before using Private Route for DAI on Solana to ARB on Ethereum?

Confirm the live privacy status, provider, exact DAI source representation, ARB destination representation, amount, region, fees, address, and any verification request. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. An Ethereum receipt is an L1 native ETH balance or ERC-20 contract event; later token movement can require ETH gas and a new approval for another contract. A receiving wallet should show the exact ARB contract on the destination. Receipt does not fund ETH gas for later token movement.

Which DAI on Solana records remain public?

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. The DAI deposit, gas funding, approval or native transfer, amount, and timing remain outside any promise of invisibility.

Which ARB on Ethereum records remain public after delivery?

Ethereum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. It is the settlement-layer EVM network for this inventory. ERC-20 transfers can require a separate approval, base fee and priority fee affect source cost, and an L1 token contract does not establish an L2 representation. The ARB receipt and later wallet activity remain observable on that ledger.

Can EVM and Solana records still be correlated?

Potentially. The 0x-side transaction and Solana signature are separate, but comparable amounts, close timing, token representations, provider observations, address reuse, and later consolidation can still support association.

Do stablecoins create additional privacy considerations here?

Yes. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. A receiving wallet should show the exact ARB contract on the destination. Receipt does not fund ETH gas for later token movement. Issuer, representation, amount, timing, and receiving-service context can remain observable.

How do DAI source records differ from ARB receipt records?

DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. A receiving wallet should show the exact ARB contract on the destination. Receipt does not fund ETH gas for later token movement. Private Route does not erase either asset-specific record.

Does this private DAI to ARB route guarantee no KYC?

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. An Ethereum receipt is an L1 native ETH balance or ERC-20 contract event; later token movement can require ETH gas and a new approval for another contract. A receiving wallet should show the exact ARB contract on the destination. Receipt does not fund ETH gas for later token movement.

View all Help Center FAQs →