Private ETH on zkSync Era to DAI on Polygon Swap

FromzkSync Era
ToPolygon
ENTER AMOUNT
Squatch Guard
Before a deposit order moves forward, Squatch Guard checks the amount, asset, network, and active quote window against the order details.
ETH / USD
Price
24h
High
Low
Vol

What you need to know

Privacy considerations for ETH to DAI

Where offered, Private Route is designed to reduce an obvious direct association between the sending wallet and received assets; it does not make ETH on zkSync Era or DAI on Polygon activity anonymous or invisible. zkSync Era exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. It is a zero-knowledge rollup using EraVM and native account-abstraction features while settling proofs to Ethereum. Execution, fee estimation, and contract compatibility can differ from a byte-for-byte Ethereum assumption. Polygon exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. Polygon PoS uses an EVM sidechain architecture with its own validator checkpoints and gas balance. Its token representations and bridge behavior are separate from Ethereum L1 even when wallets use the same 0x account. ETH is native gas on Ethereum and several rollups, but each network maintains a separate ETH balance and transaction history. A contract-wrapped form is not the native gas balance. DAI is a crypto-backed dollar-oriented stablecoin whose canonical and bridged contracts vary by network. Its peg design does not make two network representations interchangeable. Stablecoins can exist through different contracts and issuers on different networks. Confirm the exact representation and remember that contract events, issuer controls, receiving services, and later transfers can add context beyond the immediate swap. Identity-verification requirements are separate and must be checked in the live flow.

What remains visible on zkSync Era

zkSync Era exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. It is a zero-knowledge rollup using EraVM and native account-abstraction features while settling proofs to Ethereum. Execution, fee estimation, and contract compatibility can differ from a byte-for-byte Ethereum assumption. ETH is the native gas asset for zkSync Era. Reusing the sending address, approval pattern, or recognizable amount can preserve source-side context.

What remains visible on Polygon

Polygon exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. Polygon PoS uses an EVM sidechain architecture with its own validator checkpoints and gas balance. Its token representations and bridge behavior are separate from Ethereum L1 even when wallets use the same 0x account. Receiving-address reuse, immediate consolidation, and later transfers can create destination-side associations.

zkSync Era source role versus Polygon destination role

A zkSync Era source executes in EraVM with native account-abstraction behavior and ETH fees before proof settlement to Ethereum. Those source-side events remain visible. A Polygon PoS receipt follows Polygon token contracts and checkpointed execution; later movement uses POL gas rather than Ethereum L1 gas. That receipt and later destination activity remain visible.

zkSync Era and Polygon keep separate account histories

The same-looking 0x wallet syntax does not combine the two ledgers. A zkSync Era source executes in EraVM with native account-abstraction behavior and ETH fees before proof settlement to Ethereum. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. A Polygon PoS receipt follows Polygon token contracts and checkpointed execution; later movement uses POL gas rather than Ethereum L1 gas. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path. Rollup inclusion and settlement can also expose different timing milestones.

Stablecoin contracts add representation and issuer context

Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path. Destination receipt remains visible. Issuer controls, receiving-service deposits, and later transfers can provide context beyond the immediate route.

Native ETH gas and value evidence; DAI collateral-token and bridge evidence

Native ETH can expose both transfer value and gas funding on the selected network. Rollup balances, Ethereum L1 balances, and WETH contracts remain separate public records. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. Those source events remain public. DAI is a crypto-backed stablecoin, but each network representation has its own public contract events. Provider routing does not hide allowances, transfers, receiving addresses, or later consolidation. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path. The receipt and later destination use remain public.

What Private Route changes—and what it does not

Private routing can reduce direct wallet association, but stablecoin contract events, issuer context, provider observations, source gas, destination receipt, amounts, timing, and later transfers remain visible. A zkSync Era source executes in EraVM with native account-abstraction behavior and ETH fees before proof settlement to Ethereum. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. A Polygon PoS receipt follows Polygon token contracts and checkpointed execution; later movement uses POL gas rather than Ethereum L1 gas. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path.

Verification and provider policy for this exact route

The live provider evaluates the exact stablecoin contract or native label, counter-asset, amount, region, and current policy. Issuer controls and provider identity checks are separate, and neither is waived by Private Route. A zkSync Era source executes in EraVM with native account-abstraction behavior and ETH fees before proof settlement to Ethereum. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. A Polygon PoS receipt follows Polygon token contracts and checkpointed execution; later movement uses POL gas rather than Ethereum L1 gas. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path.

Private Route for ETH → DAI

zkSync Era wallet, token-transfer, contract, log, and gas activity remain public, and Polygon wallet, token-transfer, contract, log, and gas activity remain public. For this ETH on zkSync Era to DAI on Polygon path, Private Route is intended to reduce the direct visible relationship between activity around the source-side EVM 0x account address and destination-side EVM 0x account address; it does not hide either chain's public records.

  • Reduces the obvious link between the ETH deposit and DAI receipt
  • Compare standard and Private Route options for zkSync Era → Polygon
  • Shows what remains public on zkSync Era and Polygon before you deposit
Check Private Route availability →

Related routes

Private ETH on zkSync Era to DAI on Polygon Swap FAQs

What must be checked before using Private Route for ETH on zkSync Era to DAI on Polygon?

Confirm the live privacy status, provider, exact ETH source representation, DAI destination representation, amount, region, fees, address, and any verification request. A zkSync Era source executes in EraVM with native account-abstraction behavior and ETH fees before proof settlement to Ethereum. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. A Polygon PoS receipt follows Polygon token contracts and checkpointed execution; later movement uses POL gas rather than Ethereum L1 gas. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path.

Which ETH on zkSync Era records remain public?

zkSync Era exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. It is a zero-knowledge rollup using EraVM and native account-abstraction features while settling proofs to Ethereum. Execution, fee estimation, and contract compatibility can differ from a byte-for-byte Ethereum assumption. The ETH deposit, gas funding, approval or native transfer, amount, and timing remain outside any promise of invisibility.

Which DAI on Polygon records remain public after delivery?

Polygon exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. Polygon PoS uses an EVM sidechain architecture with its own validator checkpoints and gas balance. Its token representations and bridge behavior are separate from Ethereum L1 even when wallets use the same 0x account. The DAI receipt and later wallet activity remain observable on that ledger.

Do stablecoins create additional privacy considerations here?

Yes. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path. Issuer, representation, amount, timing, and receiving-service context can remain observable.

How do ETH source records differ from DAI receipt records?

Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path. Private Route does not erase either asset-specific record.

Does this private ETH to DAI route guarantee no KYC?

The live provider evaluates the exact stablecoin contract or native label, counter-asset, amount, region, and current policy. Issuer controls and provider identity checks are separate, and neither is waived by Private Route. A zkSync Era source executes in EraVM with native account-abstraction behavior and ETH fees before proof settlement to Ethereum. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. A Polygon PoS receipt follows Polygon token contracts and checkpointed execution; later movement uses POL gas rather than Ethereum L1 gas. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path.

View all Help Center FAQs →