Sasquatch Exchange
TRADE
OrdersSupportAffiliatePrivate Swap

Private ETH on Solana to DAI on Arbitrum Swap

FromSolana
ToArbitrum
ENTER AMOUNT
Squatch Guard
Before a deposit order moves forward, Squatch Guard checks the amount, asset, network, and active quote window against the order details.
ETH / USD
Price
—
24h
—
High
—
Low
—
Vol
—

What you need to know

Privacy considerations for ETH to DAI

Where offered, Private Route is designed to reduce an obvious direct association between the sending wallet and received assets; it does not make ETH on Solana or DAI on Arbitrum activity anonymous or invisible. Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. Arbitrum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. Its Nitro optimistic-rollup design executes through a sequencer and posts compressed transaction data to Ethereum. L2 inclusion and Ethereum settlement are separate milestones, so a source receipt can advance before the rollup state is final on L1. ETH is native gas on Ethereum and several rollups, but each network maintains a separate ETH balance and transaction history. A contract-wrapped form is not the native gas balance. DAI is a crypto-backed dollar-oriented stablecoin whose canonical and bridged contracts vary by network. Its peg design does not make two network representations interchangeable. Stablecoins can exist through different contracts and issuers on different networks. Confirm the exact representation and remember that contract events, issuer controls, receiving services, and later transfers can add context beyond the immediate swap. Identity-verification requirements are separate and must be checked in the live flow.

What remains visible on Solana

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. SOL is the native gas asset for Solana. Reusing the sending address, approval pattern, or recognizable amount can preserve source-side context.

What remains visible on Arbitrum

Arbitrum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. Its Nitro optimistic-rollup design executes through a sequencer and posts compressed transaction data to Ethereum. L2 inclusion and Ethereum settlement are separate milestones, so a source receipt can advance before the rollup state is final on L1. Receiving-address reuse, immediate consolidation, and later transfers can create destination-side associations.

Solana source role versus Arbitrum destination role

A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. Those source-side events remain visible. An Arbitrum receipt appears on the Nitro L2 ledger under an Arbitrum token contract or native ETH balance; later spending needs Arbitrum ETH while L1 settlement continues separately. That receipt and later destination activity remain visible.

Solana source activity and EVM delivery remain inspectable

Solana exposes the source signature, accounts, mint or native balance changes, programs, and SOL fee. Arbitrum exposes the destination 0x account, token contract or native receipt, logs, and later gas funding.

Stablecoin contracts add representation and issuer context

Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path. Destination receipt remains visible. Issuer controls, receiving-service deposits, and later transfers can provide context beyond the immediate route.

Native ETH gas and value evidence; DAI collateral-token and bridge evidence

Native ETH can expose both transfer value and gas funding on the selected network. Rollup balances, Ethereum L1 balances, and WETH contracts remain separate public records. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. Those source events remain public. DAI is a crypto-backed stablecoin, but each network representation has its own public contract events. Provider routing does not hide allowances, transfers, receiving addresses, or later consolidation. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path. The receipt and later destination use remain public.

What Private Route changes—and what it does not

Private routing can reduce a direct association between the Solana source account and EVM receiver. The source signature, program and token-account changes, destination contract logs, gas, amounts, and timing remain public. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. An Arbitrum receipt appears on the Nitro L2 ledger under an Arbitrum token contract or native ETH balance; later spending needs Arbitrum ETH while L1 settlement continues separately. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path.

Verification and provider policy for this exact route

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. An Arbitrum receipt appears on the Nitro L2 ledger under an Arbitrum token contract or native ETH balance; later spending needs Arbitrum ETH while L1 settlement continues separately. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path.

Private Route for ETH → DAI

Solana account, token, program, signature, and fee activity remain public, and Arbitrum wallet, token-transfer, contract, log, and gas activity remain public. For this ETH on Solana to DAI on Arbitrum path, Private Route is intended to reduce the direct visible relationship between activity around the source-side Base58-encoded Solana account address and destination-side EVM 0x account address; it does not hide either chain's public records.

  • ✓Reduces the obvious link between the ETH deposit and DAI receipt
  • ✓Compare standard and Private Route options for Solana → Arbitrum
  • ✓Shows what remains public on Solana and Arbitrum before you deposit
Check Private Route availability →

Related routes

ETH to DAI standard routeStandard routePrivate DAI to ETH optionsReverse privacy-intent routePrivate swap directoryHow private crypto swaps workWhat blockchain data remains publicSwap DAI to ETHReverse routeEthereum (ETH)Dai (DAI)

Private ETH on Solana to DAI on Arbitrum Swap FAQs

What must be checked before using Private Route for ETH on Solana to DAI on Arbitrum?

Confirm the live privacy status, provider, exact ETH source representation, DAI destination representation, amount, region, fees, address, and any verification request. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. An Arbitrum receipt appears on the Nitro L2 ledger under an Arbitrum token contract or native ETH balance; later spending needs Arbitrum ETH while L1 settlement continues separately. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path.

Which ETH on Solana records remain public?

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. The ETH deposit, gas funding, approval or native transfer, amount, and timing remain outside any promise of invisibility.

Which DAI on Arbitrum records remain public after delivery?

Arbitrum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. Its Nitro optimistic-rollup design executes through a sequencer and posts compressed transaction data to Ethereum. L2 inclusion and Ethereum settlement are separate milestones, so a source receipt can advance before the rollup state is final on L1. The DAI receipt and later wallet activity remain observable on that ledger.

Can EVM and Solana records still be correlated?

Potentially. The 0x-side transaction and Solana signature are separate, but comparable amounts, close timing, token representations, provider observations, address reuse, and later consolidation can still support association.

Do stablecoins create additional privacy considerations here?

Yes. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path. Issuer, representation, amount, timing, and receiving-service context can remain observable.

How do ETH source records differ from DAI receipt records?

Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path. Private Route does not erase either asset-specific record.

Does this private ETH to DAI route guarantee no KYC?

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. Native ETH can fund both transfer value and gas on its selected network. If the source is WETH or another tokenized form, approval and unwrap or exchange logic differ. An Arbitrum receipt appears on the Nitro L2 ledger under an Arbitrum token contract or native ETH balance; later spending needs Arbitrum ETH while L1 settlement continues separately. The receiving wallet must recognize the exact destination DAI contract. Peg intent does not guarantee that a bridged representation has the same liquidity or issuer path.

View all Help Center FAQs →