Sasquatch Exchange
TRADE
OrdersSupportAffiliatePrivate Swap

Private DAI on Solana to LINK on zkSync Era Swap

FromSolana
TozkSync Era
ENTER AMOUNT
Squatch Guard
Before a deposit order moves forward, Squatch Guard checks the amount, asset, network, and active quote window against the order details.
LINK / USD
Price
—
24h
—
High
—
Low
—
Vol
—

What you need to know

Privacy considerations for DAI to LINK

Where offered, Private Route is designed to reduce an obvious direct association between the sending wallet and received assets; it does not make DAI on Solana or LINK on zkSync Era activity anonymous or invisible. Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. zkSync Era exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. It is a zero-knowledge rollup using EraVM and native account-abstraction features while settling proofs to Ethereum. Execution, fee estimation, and contract compatibility can differ from a byte-for-byte Ethereum assumption. DAI is a crypto-backed dollar-oriented stablecoin whose canonical and bridged contracts vary by network. Its peg design does not make two network representations interchangeable. LINK is an oracle-network utility token represented by network-specific contracts. It is not the gas asset on Ethereum or EVM rollups, and bridged LINK contracts require separate verification. Stablecoins can exist through different contracts and issuers on different networks. Confirm the exact representation and remember that contract events, issuer controls, receiving services, and later transfers can add context beyond the immediate swap. Identity-verification requirements are separate and must be checked in the live flow.

What remains visible on Solana

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. SOL is the native gas asset for Solana. Reusing the sending address, approval pattern, or recognizable amount can preserve source-side context.

What remains visible on zkSync Era

zkSync Era exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. It is a zero-knowledge rollup using EraVM and native account-abstraction features while settling proofs to Ethereum. Execution, fee estimation, and contract compatibility can differ from a byte-for-byte Ethereum assumption. Receiving-address reuse, immediate consolidation, and later transfers can create destination-side associations.

Solana source role versus zkSync Era destination role

A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. Those source-side events remain visible. A zkSync Era receipt belongs to EraVM account state and uses ETH for later fees; proof settlement to Ethereum remains distinct from L2 delivery. That receipt and later destination activity remain visible.

Solana source activity and EVM delivery remain inspectable

Solana exposes the source signature, accounts, mint or native balance changes, programs, and SOL fee. zkSync Era exposes the destination 0x account, token contract or native receipt, logs, and later gas funding.

Stablecoin contracts add representation and issuer context

DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. Source contract events remain visible. LINK arrives as a network-specific contract balance. The wallet still needs the destination native asset before it can transfer or approve LINK later. Issuer controls, receiving-service deposits, and later transfers can provide context beyond the immediate route.

DAI collateral-token and bridge evidence; LINK approval and governance-token evidence

DAI is a crypto-backed stablecoin, but each network representation has its own public contract events. Provider routing does not hide allowances, transfers, receiving addresses, or later consolidation. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. Those source events remain public. Token allowances, contract transfers, voting or utility interactions, source gas, and later wallet consolidation can remain visible for this receipt. LINK arrives as a network-specific contract balance. The wallet still needs the destination native asset before it can transfer or approve LINK later. The receipt and later destination use remain public.

What Private Route changes—and what it does not

Private routing can reduce a direct association between the Solana source account and EVM receiver. The source signature, program and token-account changes, destination contract logs, gas, amounts, and timing remain public. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. A zkSync Era receipt belongs to EraVM account state and uses ETH for later fees; proof settlement to Ethereum remains distinct from L2 delivery. LINK arrives as a network-specific contract balance. The wallet still needs the destination native asset before it can transfer or approve LINK later.

Verification and provider policy for this exact route

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. A zkSync Era receipt belongs to EraVM account state and uses ETH for later fees; proof settlement to Ethereum remains distinct from L2 delivery. LINK arrives as a network-specific contract balance. The wallet still needs the destination native asset before it can transfer or approve LINK later.

Private Route for DAI → LINK

Solana account, token, program, signature, and fee activity remain public, and zkSync Era wallet, token-transfer, contract, log, and gas activity remain public. For this DAI on Solana to LINK on zkSync Era path, Private Route is intended to reduce the direct visible relationship between activity around the source-side Base58-encoded Solana account address and destination-side EVM 0x account address; it does not hide either chain's public records.

  • ✓Reduces the obvious link between the DAI deposit and LINK receipt
  • ✓Compare standard and Private Route options for Solana → zkSync Era
  • ✓Shows what remains public on Solana and zkSync Era before you deposit
Check Private Route availability →

Related routes

DAI to LINK standard routeStandard routePrivate LINK to DAI optionsReverse privacy-intent routePrivate swap directoryHow private crypto swaps workWhat blockchain data remains publicSwap LINK to DAIReverse routeDai (DAI)Chainlink (LINK)

Private DAI on Solana to LINK on zkSync Era Swap FAQs

What must be checked before using Private Route for DAI on Solana to LINK on zkSync Era?

Confirm the live privacy status, provider, exact DAI source representation, LINK destination representation, amount, region, fees, address, and any verification request. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. A zkSync Era receipt belongs to EraVM account state and uses ETH for later fees; proof settlement to Ethereum remains distinct from L2 delivery. LINK arrives as a network-specific contract balance. The wallet still needs the destination native asset before it can transfer or approve LINK later.

Which DAI on Solana records remain public?

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. The DAI deposit, gas funding, approval or native transfer, amount, and timing remain outside any promise of invisibility.

Which LINK on zkSync Era records remain public after delivery?

zkSync Era exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. It is a zero-knowledge rollup using EraVM and native account-abstraction features while settling proofs to Ethereum. Execution, fee estimation, and contract compatibility can differ from a byte-for-byte Ethereum assumption. The LINK receipt and later wallet activity remain observable on that ledger.

Can EVM and Solana records still be correlated?

Potentially. The 0x-side transaction and Solana signature are separate, but comparable amounts, close timing, token representations, provider observations, address reuse, and later consolidation can still support association.

Do stablecoins create additional privacy considerations here?

Yes. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. LINK arrives as a network-specific contract balance. The wallet still needs the destination native asset before it can transfer or approve LINK later. Issuer, representation, amount, timing, and receiving-service context can remain observable.

How do DAI source records differ from LINK receipt records?

DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. LINK arrives as a network-specific contract balance. The wallet still needs the destination native asset before it can transfer or approve LINK later. Private Route does not erase either asset-specific record.

Does this private DAI to LINK route guarantee no KYC?

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. DAI leaves through its network-specific stablecoin contract and can require approval; the collateral design does not make a bridged DAI contract canonical. A zkSync Era receipt belongs to EraVM account state and uses ETH for later fees; proof settlement to Ethereum remains distinct from L2 delivery. LINK arrives as a network-specific contract balance. The wallet still needs the destination native asset before it can transfer or approve LINK later.

View all Help Center FAQs →