Sasquatch Exchange
TRADE
OrdersSupportAffiliatePrivate Swap

Private Solana to Arbitrum Bridge

FromSolana
ToArbitrum
ENTER AMOUNT
Squatch Guard
Before a deposit order moves forward, Squatch Guard checks the amount, asset, network, and active quote window against the order details.

What you need to know

Privacy for the Solana to Arbitrum direction

Where offered, Private Route is intended to reduce an obvious direct association between the Solana sending wallet and Arbitrum receiving wallet; it does not hide either blockchain. SOL is the native gas asset for Solana. Base58-encoded Solana account address ETH is the native gas asset for Arbitrum. EVM 0x account address Similar amounts, timing, address reuse, and later consolidation can still add association signals. Identity requirements must be checked separately.

Solana source-side visibility

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. The source deposit, gas funding, asset representation, confirmations, and sending-address history remain outside any promise of invisibility.

Arbitrum destination-side visibility

Arbitrum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. Its Nitro optimistic-rollup design executes through a sequencer and posts compressed transaction data to Ethereum. L2 inclusion and Ethereum settlement are separate milestones, so a source receipt can advance before the rollup state is final on L1. The destination delivery and later activity can remain observable even when the provider path reduces a direct association.

Solana deposit role versus Arbitrum receipt role

A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. Those deposit-side events remain public. An Arbitrum receipt appears on the Nitro L2 ledger under an Arbitrum token contract or native ETH balance; later spending needs Arbitrum ETH while L1 settlement continues separately. The receipt and later activity remain public.

Public Solana deposit and public EVM delivery

The source signature, account keys, token-account changes, programs, and SOL fee remain visible. Arbitrum separately exposes the destination 0x account, asset receipt, contract logs, and later gas-funded activity.

Cross-chain linkability limits

Private routing can reduce a direct association between the Solana source account and EVM receiver. The source signature, program and token-account changes, destination contract logs, gas, amounts, and timing remain public. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. An Arbitrum receipt appears on the Nitro L2 ledger under an Arbitrum token contract or native ETH balance; later spending needs Arbitrum ETH while L1 settlement continues separately.

Verification status is separate from privacy status

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. An Arbitrum receipt appears on the Nitro L2 ledger under an Arbitrum token contract or native ETH balance; later spending needs Arbitrum ETH while L1 settlement continues separately.

Private Route for USDC → USDC

Solana account, token, program, signature, and fee activity remain public, and Arbitrum wallet, token-transfer, contract, log, and gas activity remain public. For this USDC on Solana to USDC on Arbitrum path, Private Route is intended to reduce the direct visible relationship between activity around the source-side Base58-encoded Solana account address and destination-side EVM 0x account address; it does not hide either chain's public records.

  • ✓Reduces the obvious link between the USDC deposit and USDC receipt
  • ✓Compare standard and Private Route options for Solana → Arbitrum
  • ✓Shows what remains public on Solana and Arbitrum before you deposit
Check Private Route availability →

Related routes

Solana to Arbitrum standard bridgeStandard routePrivate Arbitrum to Solana optionsReverse privacy-intent routePrivate Solana bridge routesPrivate Arbitrum bridge routesPrivate bridge directoryHow private cross-chain routing worksBridge Arbitrum to SolanaReverse routeBridge Avalanche to ArbitrumRelated network route

Private Solana to Arbitrum Bridge FAQs

What must be verified for a private Solana to Arbitrum bridge?

Check the exact source and destination asset representations, live privacy status, provider, amount, region, source gas, destination address, fees, and any verification request. Standard bridge support is not proof of private availability.

Which Solana bridge records remain public?

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. The deposit, gas funding, representation, confirmations, amount, and sending-address history remain observable.

Which Arbitrum records remain public after receipt?

Arbitrum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. Its Nitro optimistic-rollup design executes through a sequencer and posts compressed transaction data to Ethereum. L2 inclusion and Ethereum settlement are separate milestones, so a source receipt can advance before the rollup state is final on L1. Delivery and later activity remain observable even if the provider path reduces direct wallet association.

Can the EVM transaction and Solana signature still be compared?

Potentially. They use different ledgers, but amount, timing, token representation, provider observations, address reuse, and later consolidation can still create context.

Does private Solana to Arbitrum bridging guarantee no KYC?

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. A Solana source signs over accounts or token accounts, identifies SPL assets by mint, and spends SOL for transaction fees. An Arbitrum receipt appears on the Nitro L2 ledger under an Arbitrum token contract or native ETH balance; later spending needs Arbitrum ETH while L1 settlement continues separately.

View all Help Center FAQs →