Sasquatch Exchange
TRADE
OrdersSupportAffiliatePrivate Swap

Private Arbitrum to Solana Bridge

FromArbitrum
ToSolana
ENTER AMOUNT
Squatch Guard
Before a deposit order moves forward, Squatch Guard checks the amount, asset, network, and active quote window against the order details.

What you need to know

Privacy for the Arbitrum to Solana direction

Where offered, Private Route is intended to reduce an obvious direct association between the Arbitrum sending wallet and Solana receiving wallet; it does not hide either blockchain. ETH is the native gas asset for Arbitrum. EVM 0x account address SOL is the native gas asset for Solana. Base58-encoded Solana account address Similar amounts, timing, address reuse, and later consolidation can still add association signals. Identity requirements must be checked separately.

Arbitrum source-side visibility

Arbitrum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. Its Nitro optimistic-rollup design executes through a sequencer and posts compressed transaction data to Ethereum. L2 inclusion and Ethereum settlement are separate milestones, so a source receipt can advance before the rollup state is final on L1. The source deposit, gas funding, asset representation, confirmations, and sending-address history remain outside any promise of invisibility.

Solana destination-side visibility

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. The destination delivery and later activity can remain observable even when the provider path reduces a direct association.

Arbitrum deposit role versus Solana receipt role

On an Arbitrum source, the Nitro sequencer records L2 execution before Ethereum settlement completes; ETH funds gas and ERC-20 inputs can need approval. Those deposit-side events remain public. A Solana receipt uses a native SOL balance or SPL token account identified by mint; later token movement and account creation use SOL fees. The receipt and later activity remain public.

Public EVM deposit and public Solana delivery

Arbitrum exposes the 0x sender, gas, approvals, and deposit event. Solana exposes the receiving accounts, mint changes, program calls, signature, SOL fee, and later activity. Private Route does not make either record disappear.

Cross-chain linkability limits

Private routing can reduce a direct association between the EVM deposit account and Solana receiving account. The 0x transaction, approval, gas, Solana signature, token-account changes, amounts, and timing remain public evidence. On an Arbitrum source, the Nitro sequencer records L2 execution before Ethereum settlement completes; ETH funds gas and ERC-20 inputs can need approval. A Solana receipt uses a native SOL balance or SPL token account identified by mint; later token movement and account creation use SOL fees.

Verification status is separate from privacy status

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. On an Arbitrum source, the Nitro sequencer records L2 execution before Ethereum settlement completes; ETH funds gas and ERC-20 inputs can need approval. A Solana receipt uses a native SOL balance or SPL token account identified by mint; later token movement and account creation use SOL fees.

Private Route for USDC → USDC

Arbitrum wallet, token-transfer, contract, log, and gas activity remain public, and Solana account, token, program, signature, and fee activity remain public. For this USDC on Arbitrum to USDC on Solana path, Private Route is intended to reduce the direct visible relationship between activity around the source-side EVM 0x account address and destination-side Base58-encoded Solana account address; it does not hide either chain's public records.

  • ✓Reduces the obvious link between the USDC deposit and USDC receipt
  • ✓Compare standard and Private Route options for Arbitrum → Solana
  • ✓Shows what remains public on Arbitrum and Solana before you deposit
Check Private Route availability →

Related routes

Arbitrum to Solana standard bridgeStandard routePrivate Solana to Arbitrum optionsReverse privacy-intent routePrivate Arbitrum bridge routesPrivate Solana bridge routesPrivate bridge directoryHow private cross-chain routing worksBridge Solana to ArbitrumReverse routeBridge Arbitrum to AvalancheRelated network route

Private Arbitrum to Solana Bridge FAQs

What must be verified for a private Arbitrum to Solana bridge?

Check the exact source and destination asset representations, live privacy status, provider, amount, region, source gas, destination address, fees, and any verification request. Standard bridge support is not proof of private availability.

Which Arbitrum bridge records remain public?

Arbitrum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. Its Nitro optimistic-rollup design executes through a sequencer and posts compressed transaction data to Ethereum. L2 inclusion and Ethereum settlement are separate milestones, so a source receipt can advance before the rollup state is final on L1. The deposit, gas funding, representation, confirmations, amount, and sending-address history remain observable.

Which Solana records remain public after receipt?

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. Delivery and later activity remain observable even if the provider path reduces direct wallet association.

Can the EVM transaction and Solana signature still be compared?

Potentially. They use different ledgers, but amount, timing, token representation, provider observations, address reuse, and later consolidation can still create context.

Does private Arbitrum to Solana bridging guarantee no KYC?

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. On an Arbitrum source, the Nitro sequencer records L2 execution before Ethereum settlement completes; ETH funds gas and ERC-20 inputs can need approval. A Solana receipt uses a native SOL balance or SPL token account identified by mint; later token movement and account creation use SOL fees.

View all Help Center FAQs →