Sasquatch Exchange
TRADE
OrdersSupportAffiliatePrivate Swap

Private Ethereum to Solana Bridge

FromEthereum
ToSolana
ENTER AMOUNT
Squatch Guard
Before a deposit order moves forward, Squatch Guard checks the amount, asset, network, and active quote window against the order details.

What you need to know

Privacy for the Ethereum to Solana direction

Where offered, Private Route is intended to reduce an obvious direct association between the Ethereum sending wallet and Solana receiving wallet; it does not hide either blockchain. ETH is the native gas asset for Ethereum. EVM 0x account address SOL is the native gas asset for Solana. Base58-encoded Solana account address Similar amounts, timing, address reuse, and later consolidation can still add association signals. Identity requirements must be checked separately.

Ethereum source-side visibility

Ethereum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. It is the settlement-layer EVM network for this inventory. ERC-20 transfers can require a separate approval, base fee and priority fee affect source cost, and an L1 token contract does not establish an L2 representation. The source deposit, gas funding, asset representation, confirmations, and sending-address history remain outside any promise of invisibility.

Solana destination-side visibility

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. The destination delivery and later activity can remain observable even when the provider path reduces a direct association.

Ethereum deposit role versus Solana receipt role

An Ethereum source pays L1 base and priority fees in ETH, and an ERC-20 input can require a separate approval before the route deposit. Those deposit-side events remain public. A Solana receipt uses a native SOL balance or SPL token account identified by mint; later token movement and account creation use SOL fees. The receipt and later activity remain public.

Public EVM deposit and public Solana delivery

Ethereum exposes the 0x sender, gas, approvals, and deposit event. Solana exposes the receiving accounts, mint changes, program calls, signature, SOL fee, and later activity. Private Route does not make either record disappear.

Cross-chain linkability limits

Private routing can reduce a direct association between the EVM deposit account and Solana receiving account. The 0x transaction, approval, gas, Solana signature, token-account changes, amounts, and timing remain public evidence. An Ethereum source pays L1 base and priority fees in ETH, and an ERC-20 input can require a separate approval before the route deposit. A Solana receipt uses a native SOL balance or SPL token account identified by mint; later token movement and account creation use SOL fees.

Verification status is separate from privacy status

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. An Ethereum source pays L1 base and priority fees in ETH, and an ERC-20 input can require a separate approval before the route deposit. A Solana receipt uses a native SOL balance or SPL token account identified by mint; later token movement and account creation use SOL fees.

Private Route for USDC → USDC

Ethereum wallet, token-transfer, contract, log, and gas activity remain public, and Solana account, token, program, signature, and fee activity remain public. For this USDC on Ethereum to USDC on Solana path, Private Route is intended to reduce the direct visible relationship between activity around the source-side EVM 0x account address and destination-side Base58-encoded Solana account address; it does not hide either chain's public records.

  • ✓Reduces the obvious link between the USDC deposit and USDC receipt
  • ✓Compare standard and Private Route options for Ethereum → Solana
  • ✓Shows what remains public on Ethereum and Solana before you deposit
Check Private Route availability →

Related routes

Ethereum to Solana standard bridgeStandard routePrivate Solana to Ethereum optionsReverse privacy-intent routePrivate Ethereum bridge routesPrivate Solana bridge routesPrivate bridge directoryHow private cross-chain routing worksBridge Solana to EthereumReverse routeBridge Arbitrum to SolanaRelated network route

Private Ethereum to Solana Bridge FAQs

What must be verified for a private Ethereum to Solana bridge?

Check the exact source and destination asset representations, live privacy status, provider, amount, region, source gas, destination address, fees, and any verification request. Standard bridge support is not proof of private availability.

Which Ethereum bridge records remain public?

Ethereum exposes account history, token approvals, contract calls, logs, gas funding, amounts, and timing under its own chain identifier. It is the settlement-layer EVM network for this inventory. ERC-20 transfers can require a separate approval, base fee and priority fee affect source cost, and an L1 token contract does not establish an L2 representation. The deposit, gas funding, representation, confirmations, amount, and sending-address history remain observable.

Which Solana records remain public after receipt?

Solana exposes account keys, transaction signatures, token-account changes, program calls, amounts, fees, and timing. It uses an account-and-program execution model with transaction signatures rather than EVM hashes. SPL tokens use mint and token-account records, and a receiving wallet may need the correct associated token account plus SOL for later activity. Delivery and later activity remain observable even if the provider path reduces direct wallet association.

Can the EVM transaction and Solana signature still be compared?

Potentially. They use different ledgers, but amount, timing, token representation, provider observations, address reuse, and later consolidation can still create context.

Does private Ethereum to Solana bridging guarantee no KYC?

Provider policy is evaluated for the exact Solana mint or native asset, the other network representation, amount, and region. Cross-ecosystem wallet compatibility and no-KYC status are separate checks. An Ethereum source pays L1 base and priority fees in ETH, and an ERC-20 input can require a separate approval before the route deposit. A Solana receipt uses a native SOL balance or SPL token account identified by mint; later token movement and account creation use SOL fees.

View all Help Center FAQs →